84-F-61 - Contingent fees in structured settlements

FORMAL ETHICS OPINION 84-F-61


Inquiry is made concerning the ethical responsibilities of the attorney regarding
contingent attorney fees in cases involving structured settlements.


Tennessee Formal Ethics Opinion 80-F-1 states:
... the conflict of interest that arises from the fee interest potential
of structured settlements is so inherently conducive to divided
loyalties as to amount to a conflict of interest with the client. Such
an arrangement is also in violation of DR 5-107 of the Code of
Professional Responsibility which forbids acceptance by a lawyer
of compensation for his legal services from one other than his
client.
It is the opinion of the Committee that any arrangement by which
the opposing party participates in the setting of the fee charged by
the attorney to his client conflicts with the language and intent of
DR 5-107 and EC 5-22 of the Code.
Tennessee Formal Ethics Opinion 80-F-1 Supp. attempted to clarify the opinion by stating that
the opinion was not intended to condemn structured settlements.
It appears that further guidance is necessary and appropriate.
There is no ethical impropriety in the defendant's attorney offering various structured settlements
of client's funds and/or attorney's fees. This does not constitute participating in the setting of the
fee charged by the plaintiff's attorney to the client because the attorney fee is predetermined and
set by the contingency fee agreement between the attorney and client.
The interests of the attorney and the interests of the client often differ in the amounts of funds
received at various times and intervals. The attorney is placed in an ethical dilemma as to the
various methods available for structuring the receipt of the funds. In other words, there may be a
conflict of interest between the attorney and client as to whether the funds should be received
pursuant to Plan A, Plan B, or whether the funds should be received immediately.
The dilemma is resolved by allowing the attorney to receive the entire fee immediately or
electing to structure the receipt of the fee, providing the following conditions are met:
i. In the event the attorney elects to receive the entire fee
immediately, the amount of the fee shall
84-F-61 Page 2
not be enhanced beyond the original contingency fee agreement
computed on the present-day value of the entire settlement. In
such instances, the entire fee may be paid from the funds
immediately received by the client.
ii. In the event the attorney elects to structure the receipt of the
fee, then the amount of the fee shall be computed on the presentday
value of the entire settlement and set aside from the funds
immediately received by the client. The receipt of the fee may then
be structured at the election of the attorney. The structured funds
of the attorney must always remain separate and never commingled
with the funds of the client.
This 18th day of November , 1983.
ETHICS COMMITTEE:
O. B. Hofstetter, Jr.
F. Evans Harvill
William R. Willis
APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD